CaseSnappy Blog

Crunching Concepts: Unlocking Sovereign Immunity

5 February 2025 | CaseSnappy Team

Queen and king chess pieces on a chess board.

Introduction

Welcome back, esteemed readers! As we continue our journey through the landscape of legal doctrines, today we turn our focus to a cornerstone of governmental jurisprudence: sovereign immunity. This compelling concept safeguards the functions of the state, balancing power between the realm and its citizens. Join us as we unpack how sovereign immunity shapes legal proceedings and the exceptions that ensure fairness in governance.

What is Sovereign Immunity?

Sovereign immunity, also known as Crown immunity in the United Kingdom, is a legal doctrine that shields the state and its representatives from being sued or subjected to legal action without their consent. Rooted in the historical principle that 'the King (or Queen) can do no wrong,' this protective measure extends to both central and local government entities, as well as their officials. It encompasses both the Crown's public and private capacities, affirming the prudence of allowing the state operational efficiency free from incessant legal distractions.

Why is Sovereign Immunity Important?

Understanding sovereign immunity is pivotal for several reasons:

1. Balance of Power: It acts as a vital mechanism to maintain equilibrium between state authority and individual rights, preventing the judicial system from becoming a battleground for governmental interference.

2. Governmental Efficiency: By insulating state functions from perpetual legal entanglements, sovereign immunity ensures that the government can pursue its duties without the burden of incessant litigation.

3. Safeguards and Limitations: While sovereign immunity fortifies state operations, it is occasionally criticised for the potential to abuse power. This criticism has paved the way for specific exceptions, enhancing oversight and ensuring accountability.

Example Cases on Sovereign Immunity

Entick v Carrington [1765] EWHC KB J98: A seminal case in the annals of English law, Entick v Carrington asserted the liability of state actors for their individual actions, even under the guise of Crown authority. This case was instrumental in framing the modern understanding of sovereign immunity, balancing governmental privilege with personal accountability.

CaseSnappy: Simplifying Legal Complexities

At CaseSnappy, we strive to transform the complexities of legal doctrines into engaging and accessible insights. We hope our discussion on sovereign immunity has illuminated its crucial role in preserving state operations while ensuring justice.

As we take a brief hiatus from our Crunching Concepts series, we look forward to returning in the future to further explore the intricate world of legal practice. In the meantime, continue your quest for knowledge by signing up to CaseSnappy, where we equip you with clear and insightful legal understanding!

Get started
By using CaseSnappy, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.