In the complex realm of European Union law, maintaining a balance between trade liberalisation and the autonomy of member states stands as a perennial challenge. This tension is vividly illustrated in the case of Commission v Italy (Free movement of goods) [2009] ECR 519, also known as Trailers. This chapter of Decoding Judgements explores how Italy justified a measure perceived to hinder the free movement of goods within the EU, invoking road safety.
The European Commission launched a legal challenge against Italy, disputing the prohibition imposed by the Italian government on towing trailers with mopeds, motorcycles, tricycles, and quadricycles. The Commission contended that this prohibition acted as a barrier to the importation and sale of motorcycle trailers, thereby conflicting with Article 28 EC, which precludes measures equivalent to quantitative restrictions on imports. Italy, however, anchored its defence on road safety imperatives.
At the heart of this legal conflict was the question of whether the Italian prohibition constituted an undue restriction on the free movement of goods by effectively banning trailers legally manufactured and marketed in other EU member states. The Commission highlighted how this impeded trade, while Italy insisted that its national measure targeted road safety, a non-discriminatory and objective justification.
The European Court of Justice ultimately sided with Italy. The Court acknowledged the discretion member states possess in setting their road safety standards, affirming that Italy's measure was both appropriate and necessary. Key to this decision were the Court's observations that the combination of motorcycle and trailer could indeed pose significant road safety risks, and Italy's initiative in imposing the ban was driven by genuine safety concerns rather than protectionism.
The Court concluded that '... it must be held that the prohibition on motorcycles towing trailers specially designed for them and lawfully produced and marketed in Member States other than the Italian Republic must be regarded as justified by reasons relating to the protection of road safety.'
Commission v Italy (Trailers) offers a profound insight into the delicate balancing act between EU trade objectives and individual member state prerogatives. It underscores the latitude allowed to member states in safeguarding public interests such as road safety, even when such measures intersect with the principles of free trade.
Become a CaseSnappy member for free to further explore these dynamic legal landscapes and how they shape EU law and governance. Stay tuned for more illuminating insights as we continue our journey through pivotal legal rulings!