In the murky world of criminal law, intent can make or break a case. Such was the intrigue surrounding R v White [1910] UKLawRpKQB 82; (1910) 2 KB 124, a case that examined the complex intersections of intent, causation, and attempted murder. As we continue our journey through the world of UK law, we turn our attention to this case—an exemplification of the subtleties of criminal law's 'but for' test of causation.
White's case would intrigue thriller novelists. He was accused of murdering his mother by secretly introducing a dose of cyanide into her evening drink. His aim? To gradually cause her death over a series of doses. However, unexpectedly, his mother died of a heart attack, not cyanide poisoning—a twist that complicated matters. Medical evidence confirmed the natural cause of death, leaving White's attempt at murder in question.
On appeal, White's case presented two critical questions. First, could he be held liable for murder when his actions didn't directly cause the death? And second, could administering a non-lethal dose in a planned series constitute an 'attempt' to murder? These questions nudged the court towards an intricate voyage of legal interpretation.
The Court upheld White's conviction for attempted murder, endorsing his life sentence. The critical insight here lay in the distinction between mere preparation and actual attempt. The judges maintained that White's act of introducing cyanide into the drink was part of a commenced harmful scheme aimed at causing death, regardless of the cumulative or direct effect. Even though his mother's death resulted from a heart attack, the court upheld the conviction because the commencement of the plan, coupled with action towards lethal intent, comprised enough grounds for attempted murder.
As put by Judge Bray, "... the completion or attempted completion of one of a series of acts intended by a man to result in killing is an attempt to murder even although this completed act would not, unless followed by the other acts, result in killing. It might be the beginning of the attempt, but would none the less be an attempt."
R v White intricately combines the nuances of intent, causation, and criminal liability, exposing the complexity inherent in many criminal cases. At CaseSnappy, we untangle these complex legal narratives, elucidating the multifaceted paradigms of law.
Sign up for free and join us on our legal exploration. Stay tuned for our next instalment in the Decoding Judgements series!